Software Music Machine Archive |
|
December 2000 Archive of Music Software Discussion & Help Page
Submitted by hq_admin_smm on Fri, 12/01/2000 - 05:00.
Music Software Discussion and Help
Archive: December 2000
Check out this site...
Popular Comments:
- Roland EP7 manual (8)
- free mohabbatein and loads more INDIAN RINGTONES, FREE (669)
- can i isolate vocals? (music-editor) (2)
- OPCODE Studio 64X driver (60)
- anastasia font for encore (6)
- Audible Audio file conversion (43)
- CASIO CTK-731 Software, PLEASE!!!!!! (4)
- sheet music transposer (1)
- Cubase 5 and emagic MT4 (1)
- NEED PXD TO WAV/MP3 CONVERTER (2)
Advertisement
Change Pitch of Audio File and Record
I need to change the pitch of audio files and then record.
Ideas?
PITCH SHIFTER(common on most efx boxs')
: I need to change the pitch of audio files and then record.
: Ideas?
remove thy head from rectum and explore keyword
: I need to change the pitch of audio files and then record.
: Ideas?
Huh???...2
Check out the file area on this board for FX. You have to 'PITCH CHANGE' the audio and then process the file with an FX program or Pluggin (running from within a VST (or other) compatible Application).
If I want to do it then I would run on of my Audio editors and then process the file with a pitch change pluggin. When I hear the desired result, I would press "OK" and it would process the file permanently (or a copy).
For your information, you can also use a Time stretching effect that will change the speed of the material without changing the pitch. I know this is not what you want to do although it does alert you to the technology as an option. Check the file area under FX or Editors (as they usually have some FX built in.)
regards
Steve...R
2 burning questions
could anybody kindly pass me a manual for cubase 3.65?
also, how do you multirecord a couple of instruments using a small mixing table and souldblaster live value? cable insertion? configuring cubase?
don´t know if I can pass most of you anything you don´t know already but i´ll be happy to try.....
How to copy cda songs to disc with adaptec 4.0
How do you copy cda songs to a disc with adaptec 4.0. I keep getting error messages but I know the disc is good.
Re: How to copy cda songs to disc with adaptec 4.0
Fred
if you're using adaptec easy cd creator-
using that explorer thing in the top half of the screen drag down the cda files you want to burn.
when they're down in the bottom half right click on them and click pre-record to wav file. this will make them wav files and then you can burn the songs.
Ara :o)
LOOKING.. Audio DJ Game.
Im looking for any free downloads anyone might know about on an audio DJ type game that would alow me to mix sounds.
Waddayamean "game"?
: Im looking for any free downloads
: anyone might know about on an audio
: DJ type game that would alow me to mix sounds.
And what exactly would be the game element
in this case?
b.l.a.
convert .mpeg to .mov
Does anyone know of any software that converts .mpeg to .mov files thank you
Burner Problems
Greetings all, as heading says, I have a problem with my CD-R/RW, actually I believe the problem to lay more with my CD-ROM, via Easy CD Creator 4 Deluxe etc I keep getting error messages with audio (initial reading) disks, data disks don't appear to be a problem - I know that it does work, but whilst dealing with other issues, this has happened - does anyone have any ideas??? I've tried virtually everything, all the way to a complete removal/install, owing to shonky shop/"technician" etc, had to replace CD-ROM and play in BIOS, not to mention reset motherboard etc etc.
Am using AMD k6-2 450 (overclocked to 500) 128MB RAM, Soundblaster Live!,98lite,Diamond Data x50 CD-ROM, Mustek (same shop - have a receipt for an LG!!!!) 4x4x32, only 4.3gig HDD, plugged into Pioneer 50x50, Bose 110 studio monitors, Easy CD Creator Deluxe, CoolEdit Pro (what I've eventually settled on w/ software)
Re: Burner Problems
: Greetings all, as heading says, I have a problem with my CD-R/RW, actually I believe the problem to lay more with my CD-ROM, I keep getting error messages with audio (initial reading) disks, data disks don't appear to be a problem - I know that it does work, but whilst dealing with other issues, this has happened - does anyone have any ideas??? I've tried virtually everything, all the way to a complete removal/install, owing to shonky shop/"technician" etc, had to replace CD-ROM and play in BIOS, not to mention reset motherboard etc etc.
: Am using AMD k6-2 450 (overclocked to 500) 128MB RAM, Soundblaster Live!,98lite,Diamond Data x50 CD-ROM, Mustek (same shop - have a receipt for an LG!!!!) 4x4x32, only 4.3gig HDD, plugged into Pioneer 50x50, Bose 110 studio monitors, Easy CD Creator Deluxe, CoolEdit Pro (what I've eventually settled on w/ software)
can i trigger software synths with a guitar synth pickup?
could i trigger a soft synth(any soft synth) with a guitar synth pickup or will I have to buy one of rolands synth modules?Also,cakewalk guitar is not an option for my mac.(dont tell me to get a pc STEVE, im happy with my MAC)
note:steve is not steve r.; steve r. unlike steve is aware of the macs superiority as a platform for daw's
Midi controllers
Hi,
Midi controllers whether keyboard or guitar will output Midi information which can control any Midi compatible softsynth. If you have a Midi guitar convertor then it will output Midi. Connect that to the Computer and the rest will have to be done from within the softsynth. It should be very easy.
regards
Steve..>R
lol,phew you say potato i say MAC
Perhaps i shall not compare the macs superior risc architecture or its soon to be unrivaled os 10 to the whole ridden windows.No, ill just say this:To really run pro tools,digital performer,or logic audio a mac is requirered.
if you use a pc to run these .programs you will get less than optimal performance because theyre made for the pros.the pros who to be pro need to use a mac.I cant criticise cubase or even cakewalk. they both provide good product forthe pc. but i dont like to use unstable software...i may be pseudo intellectual but i sure aint pseudo musical
Return of the Mac?
No I've not heard of 'daw's'! Regardless, the Mac platform is NOT catered for sufficiently for it to be seriously recommended to ANYONE!
I just don't see the point in the Mac atall and firmly believe these toasters should come with an 'incompatible with quite a lot of great stuff' warning sticker! I had a Mac once and soon got very tired of not being able to use it for what everyone else was up to. They are under powered, over rated and often used by pseudo-intellectuals with a strange idea about the 'worth' of the 'PC' platform - quite worrying really. And what a waste of resources and time creating identical programs to run on different setups! Why bother? The Beta Max was dumped over the VHS quite sensibly even though it had its advantages. The fact was there was no room for the two formats, the most popular won out - amen.
Anyway to answer your question - I don't know but probablly. Someone asked a similar question here last week and were given the name of an audio>midi translator app which gave dubious results. Probablly not available for a Mac though! Give it up man! Trade the thing in and get with the jiggy.
steve
....
Steve... You should watch your argument points of fact as they are often so misguided, that I wonder about your choice of computer at all. Beta is and was a better Video platform than VHS and the consumer didn't become better off with VHS. They won the race because of Sony's marketting problems. Beta loss of the consumer market was much to do with marketting as the lack of general consumer knowledge. People buy things because they think they should or they are told they should. Beta was immediately the Pro-choice for video and still is, ever heard of Beta Cam SP?
The consumer was left with the donkee VHS because we didn't know better and the offering forces didn't care whether we had the greater or lesser offering. I don't have a problem with VHS, it works okay and that's that. It's just a shame it's not Beta.
You really have to understand there IS a reason that people choose Mac's over Microsoft if not for the fact of the operating system which (ask computer music) is a better OS generally for music. Windows 98 is considered a pain for music and the PC's architecture is not suited for low latency audio. RISC processors are and have always been around 200% faster for the give date REGARDLESS of the Mhz differences. I haven't chosen my platform for ANY fashion reasons, if you saw me, you would know why. There is no wine bar drinker here with a pair of Lime trousers and croc skin shoes. It's based on basic using of both systems and making a choice considering technology and quality, innovation. Believe and don't put people down for their choices when you don't seem to have read into the facts.
God Bless
Steve...R
my response to you misguided fools!
I'm sorry but it appears you two have been taken in, hook line and sinker, by this Mac superiority myth.
Firstly Pro Tools, as CM recently stated, is designed specifically for integration with their hardware products so it's not even close to Cubase as a virtual based only recording studio -on any number of levels. Fine, as I say if u have 10 grand then spend it on a 'Mac based' setup but that is the considered choice of some studios or 'music pro's' only. If you are neither of these things (a studio or a pro) they I'd say you are using a Mac because it makes you 'better than the rest of us'?
Secondly Steve - 'Windows 98 is considered a pain for music and the PC's architecture is not suited for low latency audio' - another complete lie! I don't find W98 a pain atall so there is half of your statement knocked clean out of the water! And the low latency question is being tackled head on! Heard of AISO? With a good card using AISO, latency does not enter the equation atall. And with the speed of modern PC processors/HD's you are surely grasping at non existent straws here. Also, I did state that Beta Max had its advantages - and the world goes on fine without it's use in the domestic setup? I think so!
Remember - Mac is the Nike of the desktop world. You are being truely conned by all the 'cool' advertising - haven't you noticed how important it makes you feel when you say 'I have a Mac'? It's the same with Nike, Coke, Guchi - 'brand' power lies in the fact that this 'Western' culture isolates the individual from the world/ other people and one way of consoling our deeply felt need for belonging is to buy the same consumer product as all the other smart/cool people do. Advertisings power lies in the fact that we want to believe.
Don't you see you are being taken for a ride by Macintosh just like all the rest of us are by Nike, Ford, MacDonalds, Imperial Tobacco, The Church Of Whatever etc etc etc? Get with it guys, if you really put yourself in the position where you believe yourselves and your platform to be superior than anybody/thing else then I'd have serious doubts about the possibility of anything creative or 'musical' eminating from you. Do you guys like UB40 by any chance? Thought so.
steve
Re: my response to you misguided fools!
: Firstly Pro Tools, as CM recently stated, is designed specifically for integration with their hardware products so it's not even close to Cubase as a virtual based only recording studio -on any number of levels. Fine, as I say if u have 10 grand then spend it on a 'Mac based' setup but that is the considered choice of some studios or 'music pro's' only. If you are neither of these things (a studio or a pro) they I'd say you are using a Mac because it makes you 'better than the rest of us'?
That's rubbish steve. I have never said that I think i'm better than anyone. The fact is we make a choice for GOOD reason and you can't see it. You are therefore the perfect PC user. Enjoy it an leave people alone.
: Secondly Steve - 'Windows 98 is considered a pain for music and the PC's architecture is not suited for low latency audio' - another complete lie! I don't find W98 a pain atall so there is half of your statement knocked clean out of the water! And the low latency question is being tackled head on! Heard of AISO? With a good card using AISO, latency does not enter the equation atall. And with the speed of modern PC processors/HD's you are surely grasping at non existent straws here. Also, I did state that Beta Max had its advantages - and the world goes on fine without it's use in the domestic setup? I think so!
ASIO actually... "Latency doesn't enter the equation at all" is pure falicy. I suggest you try actuall reading Computer Music rather than looking at the pictures. It's impossible NOT to have latency. How much of it depends on the architecture of the computer as well as the driver and soundcard.
: Remember - Mac is the Nike of the desktop world. You are being truely conned by all the 'cool' advertising - haven't you noticed how important it makes you feel when you say 'I have a Mac'? It's the same with Nike, Coke, Guchi - 'brand' power lies in the fact that this 'Western' culture isolates the individual from the world/ other people and one way of consoling our deeply felt need for belonging is to buy the same consumer product as all the other smart/cool people do. Advertisings power lies in the fact that we want to believe.
You must be able to see more than that steve. You hatred of other peoples choices should be a concern to you and presses on me that you 'are' actually feeling threatened. NOT by your deluded view that all or any Mac users 'feel' superior, but maybe by your mac using brother. Don't take it out on us.
: Don't you see you are being taken for a ride by Macintosh just like all the rest of us are by Nike, Ford, MacDonalds, Imperial Tobacco, The Church Of Whatever etc etc etc? Get with it guys, if you really put yourself in the position where you believe yourselves and your platform to be superior than anybody/thing else then I'd have serious doubts about the possibility of anything creative or 'musical' eminating from you. Do you guys like UB40 by any chance? Thought so.
No, I see clearly what I have bought, and that is the point. You feel you have the right computer and so do I. We are hardly going to talk each other into submission on this. I never wanted an argument, you just seem so highly strung out by the whole thing, I think you should start to chill out.
You don't know me at all Steve. You make judgements on my character regarding places I choose to eat and the things I choose to buy which are laughably off target. I am more a socialist than most people I know. I don't eat meat nor have been to MacDonalds in the last ten years. You suggest that I can't see straight to someone that is ripping me off whilst your ignoring what a Macintosh has to offer. You obviously know as much about the Mac as you know about me...
Also, I bought a 2 month old G4 for £950 with 192 megs of Ram. I have more or less a 48track digital studio running in my flat as a consequence. Check out the prices and then you will realise that Mac's don't cost £10,000... you really are out of touch.
Finally, anymore confused fact reporting will just discredit you further in my mind. I think you should take a deep breath and don't tech talk challenge with me expecting an easy ride. You answers on the forum have improved from your first posts (which were replied to obviously to make yourself feel more important rather than give an accurate reply). They had got to a point where we could both answer questions aware of each others presence. You answered the PC ones that I couldn't and visa versa.
At this stage and in retrospect, I can only conclude that your rude outbreak is truly attributed to your own lack of self esteem. Nobody is threatening you here steve... Just relax and lets get on with the questions.
Regards
Steve...R
RIO 600 CONTEST
Hi all,
Enter to win a RIO 600
<a href="http://www.mp3machine.com/RIO600/">http://www.mp3machine.com/RIO600/</a>
Cheers
Geoff